Eric Holder is One Tough Dude!

Today, our abysmal failure of an Attorney General, known as Eric Holder, gave a very brave speech detailing how the Obama Justice Department would challenge the Texas Voter ID law in federal court in San Antonio. Of course he bravely gave the speech 1400 miles away in Philadelphia to a friendly audience at the Urban League Convention.

He cited last year’s law suit regarding redistricting and that same court’s ruling that the maps were drawn in a manner that was overly discriminatory against Latinos. Were they? I don’t believe they were, but I am not a Latino. But then again, in Texas how many of our families are interracial and just how do you accurately determine who is Latino and who isn’t. I mean I have relations in my family and my wife’s family that are of all different colors and cultures.

As a matter of fact, I have a lifelong friend who married a young lady of Hispanic culture and they have three sons who all have German sir names. Are they Hispanic? This same friend’s sister married a Hispanic man and they have two boys and a girl all with Hispanic sir names. Which kids are Hispanic and which aren’t? This is the future of Texas and the United States. All you have to do to see the integration of america clearer is travel to a college or high school campus.

When my parents were in high school they were all segregated. By the time I was in high school integration had been the law of the land for nearly twenty years and while we were fully integrated I am afraid there was still some self segregation in the schools. Today things have changed greatly since the time my parents were in high school. Take a look and see that the kids of today are pretty well integrated when allowed to be so. When I visit my children at college or in high school I am so happy to see this taking place. It reveals a little window into martin Luther King’s dream.

Unfortunately there are far too many older folks including many in my generation who knowingly and unknowingly work to maintain the rifts between cultures and the races they need to survive financially or politically. Regardless of their party affiliation, I look at representatives in government who are of mixed racial and cultural backgrounds and I see people who should be the perfect candidates to help unite Texans and Americans.

Yet far too many of them are worried about winning the next election rather than working for the betterment of society. They can’t see past their own future to take the time to help create a brighter future for all of our children and grandchildren. As a result, I have to say that should we as a country not learn to quit bickering, to address our own flaws as a people, become proactive in our handling of the issues rather than reactionary, to unite, and to work to come together; then our current outlook is bleak.

But then you have race hustlers (who I will leave nameless); people who through their own actions make a mockery of those who came before them. People who make a mockery of addressing civil rights and racial harmony while claiming to carry the legacy of Civil rights trailblazers like Martin Luther King, James Peck, Medgar Evers, Rosa Parks, James Zwerg, or Octavio Ambrosio Larrazolo.

So to go on the plaque of race hustlers who shall remain nameless, you can etch in the name of Eric Holder because regardless of what else he says, the only way for him to keep the fires from flaming out of the liberal agenda is to keep all the racial fires stoked to an overheated frenzy.

Sadly though, this will be a costly endeavor for both the federal government and the State of Texas; and in the end it will go to the Supreme Court of the United State where they will rule as they have in similar cases in other states and the law will stand. After all, Texas’ law is less severe than the decade-old voter ID laws in either Indiana or Georgia; and amazingly enough in both of those cases minority voting increased after those laws were passed.

But Oh Well, why not waste all those federal dollars….it’s not like they’re borrowed or anything!

Bring your ID with you to the polls in November!!

Bill

Can Healthcare Insurance Really Be Required?

Many in favor of the healthcare bill and its mandated healthcare coverage for all Americans say that it is the same as requiring all drivers to get Auto Insurance.

I think we need to remember one thing.

In America we have the RIGHT to Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. So there is a right to be alive, and have a life, and live a life, and be alive (oh, I said that already)….Well, you get the point.

In the new healthcare bill the Democrats want to say that since we are alive we have to have health insurance and that it is similar to having auto insurance.

Well, let me clear something up for my friends on the left. Auto insurance is only required if I want to drive. If I do not drive, then I do not have to have auto insurance. Driving is a privilege, not a right. So I can understand having to have auto insurance to drive; however, now the Democrats want to suggest that in order to have the right to live, you must have health insurance.

To live our lives in America is a right that we are privileged to have. To force people to have to buy insurance or face a fine or jail time would seem to be unconstitutional at best. Of course, when was the last time Washington allowed the constitution, or the facts, to get in the way?


Better check my policy,
Bill

Slow Down Harry!

So Senator Harry Reid (D-Nevada) says that all the contrary talk about the senate healthcare plan is reminiscent of past obstructionism to civil rights legislation. Normally I would not even begin to entertain Harry and his usual quips of unqualified remarks made in haste to cover his rear; however, this time he leveled the criticism at the Republicans. Well, let us help Harry and do just a little check on the facts.

First, Abraham Lincoln is credited with freeing the slaves and guess what, he was…Brace Yourself… a Republican! SHHHHH, don’t tell Harry, he’s on a roll.

Second, when the great liberal leader Franklin Roosevelt had his chance to advance civil rights did he? He had 13 years to do something and only in his last few years with the persistence of his wife and other influential leaders did he even do anything. Oh there were bills, but with a heavy hand from the congressional legislators, nothing was done. Plus, Roosevelt’s reliance on southern legislators and governors for support of his social agenda made it easy for FDR not to back civil rights legislation. Job security over what is right – sounds like modern day Washington.

Now for the Third Strike! In 1964, Democrat President Lyndon Johnson was championing civil rights, who was it that blocked the legislation in the senate? You guessed it, the Democrats who stopped cloture by voting 44 out of 67 democrats to stifle the legislation.

Now, I am not saying that the Democrats of today would have voted the same way they did back then. What I am saying is that Harry has got to get a better handle on himself. I know he’s under the gun and the big man came down to see them Sunday, but come on, at least give us a better analogy than this, especially when Harry is in the party that was the obstruction of his analogy.

Slow Down Harry - Later,
Bill