With the loss of some incumbents in
this year’s primary and the squeakers by some of the other incumbents, it is
important to understand how the influence over these races is handled by the
incumbents in office. It is said in politics that the hardest thing to do is
beat an incumbent so I thought I might shine some light on this. There are
three basic advantages the incumbents have; the ability to keep their campaign
accounts open, send out free mailers while in office, and the biggest advantage
is to have congressional campaign committees to work for them.
Firstly, each congressman can go
ahead and keep campaign fundraising and create the traditional “War Chest.”
That means that during their term of service a congressman can continue to fundraise
for the upcoming election while their opponents will be limited to only fundraising
after the date they can file their appropriate state paperwork for office. Not
really fair, but hey, it’s the incumbents making those rules.
Secondly, each congressman can
continue to send out mailers to their constituency via their congressional
“updates” which are essentially propaganda packets similar to the mailers you
will be getting from them during the election with one exception…..they don’t
make harsh mention of their opponents. By the way, these aren’t free; they’re
usually paid for with tax money (Your Money) and/or possibly with that
aforementioned War Chest we talked about.
Lastly, the one that really cries
of the cronyism we all confess to despise, congressional campaign committees. Both
the senate and the House have them as do both parties as well. These committees
are supposed to help each party build majorities in their respective chamber;
however, in recent times they have become an incumbent protection syndicate.
Money is raised by these entities and rather than sit out of the primaries, as
they should, these committees use their money and influence to protect their incumbent
brethren.
A few weeks ago in the race for
the 7th Congressional District of Virginia, incumbent Eric Cantor,
who also serves as the House Majority Leader, was beaten by a political novice
in the form of College Professor named Dave Brat. Following his defeat by a
Republican in the Republican Primary, the House GOP Congressional Committee’s
leaders said that had they known Cantor was in jeopardy they would have offered
more support in the primary – WHAT!!!!!
Sounds crazy……But that’s the
norm.
Let’s look at two other recent
cases for examples of this self-protectionism.
In 2011, with redistricting up
for debate and legal action in Texas, there was much confusion over who would
run in which district. In the newly drawn Texas 35th District, Democrat
Joaquin Castro was preparing to run for office; however, Rep. Steve Israel,
leader of the DCCC, or the House Democratic Campaign Committee, said they would
support sitting Representative Lloyd Doggett who had also been drawn into that new
District. Israel said, “We have a
theocracy at the DCCC that we support sitting incumbents, across the board, in
every case, we support sitting incumbents.” It’s okay, Joaquin just ran for
office in another District where the Democrat incumbent was retiring – Problem Solved.
Before you think I am going off against the Democrats, let me
provide another example in order to show you that this is not a “Democrat vs.
Republican” issue, but it’s an “us against the entrenched incumbents” sort of
issue. Just this last week we saw the same sort of protectionist agenda in the
case of Mississippi Senator Thad Cochran. Following a pretty healthy, or
unhealthy, loss to State Senator Chris McDaniel in the Mississippi GOP Primary and
the aforementioned loss of Eric Cantor in Virginia, the National Republican
Senatorial Committee injected the Cochran Campaign with fundraisers and
influence in order to secure a victory for a career politician who first went
to Washington in 1973 – think about that! That’s a lot of protection!!
In the last few years most people, Democrat and Republican, have
been clamoring for the replacement of congressmen all over the United States,
BUT HOW? There has been a small amount of incumbents beat in the last few
years, but not enough to force the change America needs. Now I’m not saying
they all need to be removed (maybe 90%), but there does need to be some serious
change in order for America to progress forward. Unfortunately, with incumbents
holding the aces with War Chests, Free Mailers, and Campaign Committees in
their pockets, there doesn’t seem like much for the rest of us to do.
BUT THERE IS!
We must let these cats out of the bag. Question our Congressman,
both at the state and national level. Be active in the political scene. Years
ago it was said politics was one of those subjects a person didn’t bring up in
civilized conversation – NOT ANYMORE! If you’re comfortable with the direction
of where your state and country are headed then do nothing. But if you believe
things must change then all of us, each and every one of us, Republican or
Democrat, must step forward and make our voices heard. Sometimes it’s hard. Sometimes
it requires you to step out of your comfort box. But unless you are comfortable
with mediocrity, and possibly losing the very country we hold dear, then we
must all stand and make a difference.
Remember, Congress is counting on you not getting involved!!
Batter Up!
Bill
Term limits Texas has right idea part-time politicians with real jobs at home
ReplyDelete